Sole Practitioner Versus Team Approach
In any service industry, client relations are vital to success. A client expects and should receive consistent, high quality service. Traditionally this has been provided by a virtual assistant who does all of the work herself, only takes on the type of work she specializes in and the number of clients she herself can handle. The problem with this model is that if a client needs a variety of services (i.e. administrative support and bookkeeping) she is forced to hire more than one company to complete the work. By franchising and using a team approach, a full menu of services is offered and the client only has one point of contact.
Using a team approach can have its challenges. Consistent service is best provided when one person routinely performs a task for a specific client. In cases where the client is receiving such administrative services as calendar keeping, the client and virtual assistant may need to have a relationship outside of that of the client-franchise owner relationship. The franchise owner must manage the workload of each team member and client expectations to ensure that the client receives seamless service.
A client with multiple needs will have to manage several separate relationships if she uses a solo practice virtual assistant. By using a franchise with a team, the client only has to manage one relationship. The franchise has a greater depth of resources since it can also rely on the other franchise teams if needed.
I have great respect for virtual assistants who have solo practices. However, I think there is room for other models as long as everyone keeps in mind that the most important goals are providing high quality service and meeting the needs of the individual client.
RSS